Social Dynamics in Health and Wellbeing [Part 2 of 2]. ❤️‍🩹

‍

‍

2.1 The Social Contagion of Health

The principles of social comparison and peer influence are not confined to consumer behaviour; they are powerful determinants of health and wellbeing. An individual's health choices are not made in a vacuum but are deeply embedded in a social context that shapes attitudes, norms, and behaviours.¹⁶ This social context, encompassing the conditions where people are born, live, and work, can have a more significant impact on health outcomes than genetics or even access to healthcare.¹⁶

A compelling body of research demonstrates that health behaviours can spread through social networks in a manner akin to a social contagion. Key behaviours such as exercise habits, dietary choices, alcohol  consumption, and smoking are all subject to social influence.¹⁸Neuroscientific studies have even found that the mere presence of other people can alter activity in brain regions associated with reward and decision-making,  providing a biological basis for peer influence, particularly during adolescence when the brain is highly attuned to social cues.¹⁸

Peer Influence on Physical Activity

• Companionship  and Motivation: Youth are more likely to be physically active when in     the company of friends. Companionship increases the enjoyment of activity  and provides motivation to participate.²² One study found that     adolescents biked a greater distance when in the presence of a friend than     when alone.²²
• Group  Norms and Atmosphere: The overall atmosphere of a peer group, such as     a school class, plays a crucial mediating role. A class environment that     is generally positive toward sports can significantly increase an     individual student's physical activity time.²¹

Peer Influence on Diet and Nutrition

Dietary habits are similarly susceptible to social forces. A well-documented phenomenon is "social facilitation," where individuals consistently consume more food when eating in the presence of others, particularly with familiar friends and family.²³ This effects observed across various meal occasions and cultures.

In the modern context, the peer group has expanded into the digital realm, with profound consequences for nutrition and body image. Social media platforms have become a primary source of health information, but this information is often unregulated and disseminated by "influencers"who may lack professional credentials.²⁴ This digital environment amplifies social comparison, with several negative outcomes:

• Body  Image and Disordered Eating: Research suggests that social media usage  is a plausible risk factor for developing body image concerns and eating disorders. This is mediated by constant upward appearance comparisons and the internalisation of a "thin/fit ideal" presented online.²⁷
• Adoption of Unvetted Trends: Users are frequently persuaded by social media  content to adopt dietary fads (e.g., intermittent fasting, carnivore diet) and add supplements to their diets without consulting healthcare  professionals.²⁴
• Emotional Impact: This constant comparison and pressure to conform to online   trends can lead to feelings of guilt, judgment, and anxiety when users perceive their own eating habits as falling short.²⁵

The digital peer group thus acts as a powerful amplifier for both positive and negative health influences. While it can connect individuals to supportive exercise communities, it also creates an environment of persistent, curated, and often unrealistic upward comparison.

‍

Health platforms that incorporate social features must therefore be designed with an explicit awareness of these risks, actively working to mitigate the known harms of digital social comparison by verifying information, de-emphasizing curated perfection, and providing tools to manage the associated psychological pressures.

2.2 Mechanisms of Influence: How Peers Shape Our Choices

To effectively leverage peer influence, it is essential to understand the specific psychological mechanisms through which it operates. The social contagion of health is not a mystical process but is driven by a set of well-defined social and psychological dynamics.

• Social   Control and Support: Social ties directly influence health habits   through both regulation and encouragement. Social control involves one     person monitoring or regulating another's behaviour, such as a spouse encouraging adherence to a medical regimen.¹⁹ Social support,     on the other hand, provides the emotional and practical resources that     encourage individuals to adopt and maintain healthy behaviours.¹⁵
• Modelling:  As a core tenet of social learning theory, modelilng describes how  individuals adjust their own behaviour to match that of others they     observe. This is a powerful force in both diet and exercise. Children's  food selection can be influenced by observing their peers choosing healthy     snacks, and an adolescent's level of physical activity often correlates with that of their friends.²³
• Impression  Management: This mechanism refers to the conscious or unconscious  attempt to control the impressions others form of us. The desire to be viewed favourably can be a strong motivator for health-related behaviours.  For example, individuals may engage in physical activity to be perceived  as fit and self-disciplined. However, this can also have a detrimental  effect; research shows that overweight youth may avoid physical activity   for fear of being judged or teased by their peers.²²

Crucially, the path from external peer influence to internal behaviour change is not direct. It is mediated by an individual's internal psychological state, particularly their sense of self-efficacy. Research on exercise adherence in adolescents demonstrates a clear causal pathway: peer support directly boosts an individual's self-efficacy—their belief in their own ability to succeed—which in turn is a critical predictor of their adherence to an exercise regimen.²⁰

‍

This finding has profound implications for the design of social features on health platforms. The ultimate goal should not be merely to create comparison but to instill a sense of competence and confidence in the user. The underlying message should be, "Seeing my friends and peers succeed makes me believe that I can succeed too."Therefore, features should be designed to explicitly build self-efficacy by highlighting the progress of similar peers, framing challenges as achievable, celebrating small wins, and using social proof to bolster the user's belief in their own capabilities.

The relationship with another mediating factor, self-regulation, is more complex. While self-regulation is the ability to guide one's own behaviour toward a goal, strong peer influence can sometimes undermine it. For example, the social pressure to conform to a friend who decides to skipa planned workout can override an individual's self-regulatory capacity.²⁰This highlights the dual nature of peer influence—it can be a source of both motivation and derailment.

Section 3: Translating Theory into Practice: SocialFeatures in Digital Health Platforms

3.1 The Social Feature Spectrum: Competition vs.Collaboration

A fundamental strategic decision in the design of any social wellness platform is whether to frame social interactions as primarily competitive or collaborative. This choice has significant and divergent effects on user psychology and behaviour. Research from the University of Oregon, published in the International Journal of Research in Marketing, provides a clear and actionable framework for this decision.³

The study found a distinct trade-off between the two approaches:

• Competition  typified by features like leaderboards and rankings, was found to be more  effective at enhancing performance and personal growth. The pressure to outperform others pushes users to achieve more in the short term.
• Cooperation,  embodied by features like team-based goals and group challenges, was more effective for fostering continuous engagement and increasing life satisfaction. Collaborative environments reduce the fear of  embarrassment and promote a sense of belonging, which are key drivers of long-term retention and positive affect.

This theoretical framework is supported by empirical evidence from mobile health (mHealth) interventions. A systematic review found that user preferences for social features are decidedly mixed. While some users report being highly motivated by the competitive aspects of social comparison, others express a strong dislike for it, citing concerns about its potential to foster an unhealthy desire to win, its negative emotional impact, and privacy issues.³¹ This evidence strongly indicates that a single, mandatory social model is insufficient and likely to alienate a significant portion o   user base.

Team-Based Challenges as a Collaborative Cornerstone

As a primary form of collaboration, team-based challenges have proven to be a highly effective strategy, particularly in corporate wellness programs. These challenges shift the focus from individual ranking to collective achievement, fostering camaraderie, mutual support, and accountability.³³ When a group succeeds or fails together, members are motivated to encourage one another, creating a positive feedback loop. This approach has been shown to increase employee engagement, improve team cohesion, and generate significant financial returns for organisations through reduce dhealthcare costs and lower rates of sick leave.³⁴

3.2 Case Study Analysis: A Comparative Look at MarketLeaders

The strategic tension between competition and collaboration i s clearly visible in the design of leading health and wellness applications.Each has carved out a distinct market position by aligning its social model with the specific psychological needs and goals of its target audience.

‍

Analysis of Models

• Strava:     The Competitive Arena. Strava has successfully positioned itself as     the social network for serious athletes. Its core feature, the competitive     leaderboard for specific routes or "segments," is described as     the app's "big hook".⁶ This feature gamifies every     run or ride, turning it into a potential competition. The platform is     designed for a user who is already passionate about their sport and is     motivated by performance data and public comparison.³⁶ Strava's     success demonstrates the power of catering to a specific user psychology     rather than attempting to appeal to everyone.
• Fitbit:     Gamification for the Masses. Fitbit's strategy revolves around making     fitness accessible and engaging for a broad audience. It employs a wide     range of gamification mechanics—points, badges for milestones, streaks for consistency, and group challenges—to create a motivating and rewarding     experience.³⁹ The social features encourage friendly     competition and a sense of community, fostering a holistic lifestyle     narrative that drives long-term user retention.³⁸
• Noom:     The Supportive Ecosystem. Noom's model stands in stark contrast to     Strava's. It eschews overt competition in favour of a deeply supportive and  collaborative environment. The platform's "4 Cs"—Clinicians,     Coaches, Community, and Content—are built around providing psychological  support for behaviour change.⁴¹ Users are placed in small,  coach-led peer groups ("Noom Circles") where they can share     experiences and receive encouragement. This model is designed for users     who need help overcoming the psychological barriers to weight loss and who     thrive on accountability and human connection.⁴¹ Research     confirms the model's effectiveness, showing high engagement and clinically     significant weight loss.⁴⁵
• MyFitnessPal:     Utility First, Community Second. MyFitnessPal is primarily a     best-in-class tool for self-monitoring nutrition.⁴² Its social     features, mainly community forums, are largely separate from the core     tracking experience. While the forums provide a space for users to seek     support, research on their impact on adherence is mixed. Some studies show     no significant difference in weight loss compared to a control group, and     user engagement with the app tends to drop sharply after the first month.⁴²     MyFitnessPal's model shows that a successful health app can prioritise     utility, but it also suggests that a loosely integrated social feature may     have limited impact on behaviour change.

These case studies reveal that there is no single"best" social model. Success is contingent on the deliberate alignment of the social mechanics with the target user's core motivations. A platform's choice to be competitive, collaborative, or utility-focused is a defining strategic decision that shapes its entire product experience and market position.

3.3 The Nuances of Gamification: A Deep Dive into Leaderboards

Leaderboards are one of the most common and seemingly straight forward social features in health apps, yet their psychological impact is complex and often counterintuitive. While they are generally effective at increasing activity, their benefits are not distributed evenly across the user base.

A large-scale study of Fitbit users provides remarkable clarity on this topic.⁴ On average, the adoption of a leaderboard resulted in a modest but significant increase in physical activity, equivalent to an extra 370 steps per day. However, this average figure conceals a dramatic divergence in the feature's effect based on a user's prior activity level:

• For Sedentary Individuals: Leaderboards proved to be a powerful  motivational tool. Users who were inactive prior to adopting the feature     walked an additional 1,300 steps daily, a relative increase of 15%. Critically, these users benefited even when participating in small   leaderboards and did not need to rank first to feel motivated. For this  group, the leaderboard serves as a source of social accountability and a  gentle nudge toward establishing a new baseline of activity.
• For  Highly Active Individuals: Surprisingly, leaderboards had a net negative  effect. Users who were already highly active walked 630 fewer steps daily after adopting a leaderboard, a relative decrease of 5%. The analysis  suggests this occurs because highly active individuals are often placed on  small leaderboards with less active members, which can lead to  complacency. They are only motivated by large leaderboards where they have     the opportunity to compete again st other high performers and rank highly.

This research fundamentally challenges the common assumption that competitive features primarily benefit the most engaged and active users.In fact, the opposite appears to be true. The greatest motivational benefit of leaderboards is for the least active users—the very demographic that is often the hardest to engage. This has profound implications for product strategy.

Leaderboards should not be designed as a tool to retain elite users; they should be viewed as a powerful mechanism for onboarding and motivating new and   sedentary users. To counteract the potential for complacency among top performers, platforms should consider implementing more sophisticated systems, such as dynamic or tiered leaderboards (e.g., "pro" leagues) or shifting the focus of competition to metrics like consistency or personal improvement, thereby ensuring that all user segments remain appropriately challenged.

The psychological mechanisms at play are rooted in the core drives for social comparison, achievement, and public commitment.⁴⁸However, the motivational effect is not linear. Some research suggests a  U-shaped effect, where being at the very top or the very bottom of a ranking is more motivating than being in the undifferentiated middle.⁴⁹

‍

The Double-Edged Sword: Navigating the Risks of Social Comparison

While social features hold immense promise to motivate in positive behaviour change, they are a double-edged sword. When implemented without careful consideration of their psychological impact, they can become a source of anxiety, pressure, and harm, turning a tool for wellness into a catalyst for distress.

4.1 The "Comparison Cure" That Becomes a Disease

The same mechanisms that can inspire motivation can also trigger a cascade of negative psychological outcomes. The constant, quantified comparison inherent in many health and fitness apps can transform a healthy pursuit into a source of pathology.

• Anxiety,  Depression, and Isolation: A strong link exists between heavy social  media use and an increased risk for anxiety, depression, and feelings of  inadequacy.²⁸ Fitness apps, with their intense focus on performance, appearance, and public sharing, can be a particularly potent     vector for these feelings. The pressure to post regular updates, garner likes, and present a successful image can become a significant source of     stress.²⁸
• Body  Dissatisfaction and Disordered Eating: This is one of the most significant risks associated with social comparison in a health context.     Upward social comparison, especially when it involves exposure to idealiszed or unrealistic body images, has been shown to increase body     anxiety, lower self-esteem, and discourage exercise.⁵ The     relentless quantification of the body—tracking calories, steps, weight,     and macros—can lead to an unhealthy obsession with numbers, supplanting a     holistic focus on wellbeing.⁵¹ There is a well-documented     correlation between the use of calorie-tracking apps like MyFitnessPal and   an increase in disordered eating symptoms. These apps can reinforce     restrictive eating patterns, create a dichotomous "good food/bad     food" mindset, and contribute to cycles of binging and guilt.⁴³
• Unhealthy  Competition and Injury Risk: The gamification of fitness, while     motivating, can promote a "more is better" mentality that     increases the risk of overtraining and physical injury.⁵¹ The     fear of losing one's rank on a leaderboard or breaking a streak can create     stress and pressure individuals to exercise even when their body needs     rest, overriding internal physiological cues in favour of external digital     validation.³⁹

4.2 Passion vs. Obsession: The Role of Personality

The negative effects of social comparison are not experienced uniformly by all users. The impact of a social feature is heavily moderated by an individual's underlying personality traits and their relationship with the activity itself.

Research on passion in exercise makes a crucial distinction between two types ⁶:

1. Harmonious     Passion: A healthy and balanced love for an activity that is     well-integrated into one's identity. Individuals with a harmonious passion     engage in the activity because they genuinely enjoy it.
2. Obsessive     Passion: An unhealthy, rigid passion where an individual's self-esteem     becomes contingent on their performance in the activity. This often stems     from interpersonal pressure or the need for social acceptance.

Social comparison features interact with these personality types in predictable ways. For a user with a harmonious passion, seeing themselves outperform others can be a satisfying experience that benefits their performance self-esteem. For a user with an obsessive passion, however, being outperformed by others can be psychologically devastating, directly harming their contingent self-esteem.⁶

Similarly, an individual's level of self-control plays a moderating role. Users with lower self-control are more vulnerable to the negative effects of upward comparison. When confronted with a perceived large gap between themselves and a superior performer, they are more likely to experience body anxiety and may choose to disengage from the activity entirely—to "lie down"—as a way to escape the psychological threat.⁵

This evidence reveals that social comparison features act asa form of psychological "stress test." They amplify pre-existing vulnerabilities. For a confident, harmoniously passionate user, a leaderboard is an enjoyable game. For an anxious, obsessively passionate user with a history of disordered eating, that same leaderboard can be a trigger for profound psychological distress. This reality places a significant ethical responsibility on platform designers. A "one-size-fits-all" social model is not just suboptimal; it is potentially dangerous. Platforms must move toward designs that acknowledge this psychological diversity, for instance by screening users during onboarding about their goals and relationship with exercise, allowing them to opt-out of potentially triggering features, and providing prominent access to mental health and eating disorder resources.⁵⁴

Section 5: Strategic Recommendations for an Ethically-Designed Social Wellness Platform

To harness the power of social comparison while mitigatingits inherent risks, digital wellness platforms must adopt a sophisticated, psychologically-informed, and user-centric design philosophy. The followingrecommendations provide a strategic framework for building social features thatare effective, ethical, and sustainable.

5.1 The Principle of Personalisation: User Control is Paramount

The research unequivocally shows that user preferences for social features are mixed and that the effects of these features are highly heterogeneous.⁴ Therefore, the foundational principle of any social wellness design must be personalisation and user control. A mandatory,one-size-fits-all approach is destined to fail.

Recommendation: Empower users to tailor their social experience to their own goals and psychological comfort levels. This shouldinclude:

• Opt-In/Opt-Out     Functionality: Users must have the ability to easily and completely     disable all competitive or social features without penalty. Social     engagement should be an explicit choice, not a default setting.
• Granular   Privacy Controls: Users should have precise control over what activity     data is shared, when it is shared, and with whom it is shared.
• Choice     of Comparison Standard: Allow users to select their preferred     benchmark for comparison. Options should include "compare to my own     past performance," "compare only to a curated group of close     friends," and "compare to an anonymizsed group of users similar     to me." This gives users agency over the context of their comparison.

5.2 Designing for Positive-Sum Outcomes: Prioritise Collaboration

Given the evidence that cooperative interactions are superior for driving long-term engagement and life satisfaction, collaboration should be a central pillar of a platform's social strategy.³Collaborative features reframe self-improvement from a zero-sum competition into a positive-sum, mutually beneficial activity.

Recommendation: Design and prominently feature team-based, collaborative challenges where the group succeeds or fails together. This structure fosters mutual support, shared accountability, and positive social bonds.³³ Goals should be framed collectively (e.g.,"Our team's goal is to accumulate 1 million steps this month") to shift the focus from individual ranking to shared progress and achievement.

5.3 Mitigating Negative Comparison: A Framework for"Safer" Competition

When competitive elements are included, they must be designed with the explicit goal of minimizing psychological harm. The following table provides a framework for transforming high-risk competitive features into safer, more motivating alternatives.

‍

‍

5.4 The Human-in-the-Loop: The Power of Facilitated Communities

The success of Noom's coaching model demonstrates the immense value of combining peer support with professional guidance. A human facilitator can provide context, reframe negative self-talk, and ensure that community interactions remain positive and supportive, acting as a crucial buffer against the potential harms of raw social comparison.  

Recommendation: For platforms targeting users who require higher levels of support for behavior change, a "human-in-the-loop" model should be strongly considered. This could involve using trained health coaches or community managers to facilitate group discussions, answer questions, and moderate peer interactions. This approach adds a layer of psychological safety and personalised guidance that automated systems alone cannot provide, significantly enhancing the potential for positive, long-term outcomes.

Conclusion

This report has traced the path from Leon Festinger's foundational theory of social comparison to a set of actionable design principles for modern digital wellness platforms. The analysis confirms that social comparison is an immensely powerful, but psychologically volatile, tool. The impulse to "keep up with the Joneses" can be channeled to motivate exercise, improve dietary habits, and foster supportive communities. However, when misapplied, this same impulse can breed anxiety, inadequacy, and unhealthy obsessions.

A strategy of simply adding a social feed or a universal leaderboard to a health app is both naive and fraught with risk. The future of social wellness does not lie in such simplistic solutions. Instead, it demands a sophisticated, psychologically-informed approach that recognizes the diverse needs and vulnerabilities of its users.

The most successful and ethical platforms will be built on a foundation of user agency, allowing individuals to control and personalize their social experience. They will prioritise collaborative, positive-sum interactions that build community and mutual support over zero-sum competitions that can demoralise as often as they motivate. When competitive elements are used, they will be carefully designed to be inclusive, relevant, and focused on personal growth rather than raw ranking.

Ultimately, the strategic goal should be to evolve beyond merely helping users "keep up with the Joneses." The true opportunity is to create a digital "health club" where the Joneses are a supportive, relatable peer group, and where the act of "keeping up" means joining a community that empowers every member to become a healthier, more fulfilled version of themselves.

‍

Join the Renaissance in Employee Health!

If you're interested in becoming part of the THIER journey, as an individual or a company. Select the link relevant to you!

Join our Waitlist: If you are a Head of Wellness select this link

Join our Waitlist: [Gen Z, Gen X, Gen Y or Baby Boomers] select this link

Get In Touch Health Insurers Here:

Investors Get in Touch Here:

For Partnerships Get in Touch Here

‍

‍

Sources Used In This Report

en.wikipedia.org

Socialcomparison theory - Wikipedia

Opens in a newwindow

research.tilburguniversity.edu

Socialcomparison: A review of theory, research, and applications

Opens in a newwindow

business.uoregon.edu

Competitive vs.Cooperative Health and Fitness Apps | Lundquist ...

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

HealthWearables, Gamification, and Healthful Activity - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Exercise or liedown? The impact of fitness app use on users ...

Opens in a newwindow

pubsonline.informs.org

Is FitnessTechnology-Facilitated Social Comparison the Thief of Well-Being? The MediatingRole of Social Comparison on the Relationships Between Passion and PerformanceSelf-Esteem - PubsOnLine

Opens in a newwindow

positivepsychology.com

SocialComparison Theory & 12 Real-Life Examples - Positive Psychology

Opens in a newwindow

ebsco.com

Socialcomparison theory | Research Starters - EBSCO

Opens in a newwindow

open.ncl.ac.uk

SocialComparison Theory - TheoryHub - Academic theories reviews for research andT&L

Opens in a newwindow

cepr.org

Keeping up withthe Joneses: Consumption network effects | CEPR

Opens in a newwindow

researchgate.net

(PDF) Keeping upwith the joneses: emergence of travel as a form of social comparison amongmillennials - ResearchGate

Opens in a newwindow

ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk

Borrowing tokeep up (with the Joneses): Inequality, debt, and ...

Opens in a newwindow

pekinhardy.com

Keeping Up withthe Joneses - Pekin Hardy Strauss

Opens in a newwindow

uwaterloo.ca

“Keeping up withthe Joneses” | Waterloo News

Opens in a newwindow

openaccesspub.org

Social Influence| Public Health International - Open Access Pub

Opens in a newwindow

who.int

Socialdeterminants of health - World Health Organization (WHO)

Opens in a newwindow

odphp.health.gov

SocialDeterminants of Health - Healthy People 2030 | odphp.health.gov

Opens in a newwindow

newsinhealth.nih.gov

The Power of Peers | NIH Newsin Health

Opens in a new window

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

SocialRelationships and Health: A Flashpoint for Health Policy - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Peer Support andExercise Adherence in Adolescents: The Chain-Mediated Effects of Self-Efficacyand Self-Regulation - PMC

Opens in a newwindow

mdpi.com

The Peer Effect in Promoting PhysicalActivity among Adolescents: Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey -MDPI

Opens in a new window

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effect of Peersand Friends on Youth Physical Activity and Motivation to be Physically Active -PMC

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Influence ofPeers and Friends on Children's and Adolescents' Eating and Activity Behaviors- PMC

Opens in a newwindow

uri.edu

Social media'significantly' influences nutritional choices, emotional well-being, student'sstudy shows – Rhody Today

Opens in a newwindow

uri.edu

Study showssocial media's negative effect on nutritional choices, habits in URI students

Opens in a newwindow

tandfonline.com

The use ofsocial media as a source of nutrition information - Taylor & Francis Online

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The social mediadiet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media,body image and eating disorders amongst young people - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a newwindow

helpguide.org

Social Media andMental Health: Social Media Addiction - HelpGuide.org

Opens in a newwindow

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Influence ofPeers and Friends on Children's and Adolescents ...

Opens in a newwindow

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Peer Support andExercise Adherence in Adolescents: The Chain ...

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The use ofsocial features in mobile health interventions to promote physical activity: asystematic review - PMC

Opens in a newwindow

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The use ofsocial features in mobile health interventions to promote ...

Opens in a newwindow

healthyworklifespace.com

EffectiveWellness Activities for Team Building in Corporations: Creative Ideas forPromoting Physical Activity and Boosting Productivity for Remote Workers -Healthy Work Life Space

Opens in a newwindow

activeteams.co.uk

Digital and TechHealth and Wellness Virtual Challenges - Active Teams

Opens in a newwindow

matterapp.com

45+ OfficeWellness Challenges for a Healthier Team in 2025 - Matter

Opens in a newwindow

social.plus

How Stravaformed the world's biggest team: A community case study - Amity

Opens in a newwindow

uxdesign.cc

A healthy socialmedia: the UX of Strava | by Daniel de Mello | UX ...

Opens in a newwindow

businessmodelanalyst.com

Fitbit MarketingStrategy (2025) - Business Model Analyst

Opens in a newwindow

trophy.so

How Fitbit UsesGamification to Improve Engagement and Retention (2025) - Trophy

Opens in a newwindow

naturalability.com.au

UnlockingHigh-impact Success: Top Noom Weight Effective Loss Strategies Explained

Opens in a newwindow

noom.com

How Noom's 4-CsDrive Sustainable Behavior Change and ...

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effectiveness ofa smartphone application for weight loss compared to usual care in overweightprimary care patients: a randomized controlled trial - PMC

Opens in a newwindow

nottingham.ac.uk

Online healthdiscourse: How does the calorie-tracking app 'MyFitnessPal' present food andthe act of eating? Rajdeep Nagra

Opens in a newwindow

healthline.com

Noom Diet Review2025: Follow Our Tester's 12-Month Journey - Healthline

Opens in a newwindow

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Weight lossefficacy of a novel mobile Diabetes Prevention Program delivery platform withhuman coaching - PMC

Opens in a newwindow

noom.com

Publications - Noom

Opens in a new window

egrove.olemiss.edu

"A WeightIntervention Dismantling Study: The Effect of Social Support " by KathrynPrendergast - eGrove

Opens in a newwindow

commoninja.com

The PsychologyBehind Leaderboards: How Friendly Competition ...

Opens in a newwindow

researchgate.net

Leaderboards inGamified Information Systems for Health Behavior Change: The Role ofPositioning, Psychological Needs, and Gamification User Types | Request PDF -ResearchGate

Opens in a newwindow

mcleanhospital.org

Scrolling andStress: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health - McLean Hospital

Opens in a newwindow

superbcrew.com

Top Impacts OfFitness App Use On Users' Wellbeing - SuperbCrew

Opens in a newwindow

researchgate.net

Impacts ofdietary self-monitoring via MyFitnessPal to undergraduate women: A qualitativestudy | Request PDF - ResearchGate

Opens in a newwindow

reddit.com

[CONVERSATION]How using MyFitnessPal led to my binge eating and an unhealthy obsession withfood. : r/xxfitness - Reddit

Opens in a newwindow

myfitnesspal.com

CommunityGuidelines | MyFitnessPal

Opens in a newwindow

choosingtherapy.com

Noom Review 2024: Pros & Cons,Cost, & Who It's Right For

‍